Object name: NGC3821

Designation(s): NGC3821, NGC3805, NGC3816, PGC036349,

I like it when I can catch 2 objects on my to-do list in one image. They are in the hindquarters of Leo about 280 million light-years distant by both redshift and non-redshift measurements. Both are interesting. NGC 3816 appears to be the result of a merger or collision though I didn\'t find any papers suggesting this. The UGC does call it \"Slightly asymmetric\" and says \"spiral, disturbed?\" It\'s obviously highly disturbed with huge plumes. Including those plumes, it is over 300,000 light-years across. Even ignoring the plumes it is still some 175,000 light-years across. Note PGC 036349 to the east. It has a normally bright northern half but much of the southern half is exceedingly faint. Could it have interacted with NGC 3816? I came up empty trying to verify or deny this. NGC 3816 was discovered on May 9, 1864 by Heinrich d\'Arrest. It seems bright enough Herschel should have seen it but that didn\'t happen.

The other object on my to-do list was NGC 3821, an obvious ring galaxy which NED notes as having a RET nucleus. I had to look that one up. It stands for retired. Now I\'m retired but what\'s a retired nucleus? The term refers to galaxy cores that were starburst cores with starburst activity in the past and are now showing ionization as if still active but that is caused only by the ton of evolved low-mass stars created by this activity long ago. I may be retired but I don\'t have anything that could be called low-mass unfortunately. Thanks to the ring it is also a large spiral at 145,000 light-years in diameter. The galaxy was discovered by William Herschel on April 26, 1785.

When I went to frame the image, the sky reported another NGC galaxy nearby that would be in the field if I moved it a bit west which I did. It is a rather typical S0-: galaxy, NGC 3805. It is not as unusual as the other two but is also quite large as some S0 galaxies are. I can trace it out to at least 200,000 light-years across. Including the really faint outer reaches, it is likely somewhat larger if I\'d have given it more exposure time. It is slightly more distant by redshift than the first two being some 320 million light-years distant again this is both by redshift and non-redshift measurements. It was discovered by William Herschel on April 25, 1785 a day before seeing NGC 3821. Neither are in either of the Herschel 400 observing programs.

This field is on the northwestern edge of the Abell 1367 galaxy cluster which has a redshift distance of 315 million light-years according to NED. Thus these three and many others in the field are likely members of this large cluster about 3/4 of a degree away. My 2008 image of this cluster can be seen here: http://www.spacebanter.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4630&stc=1

One rather interesting galaxy that\'s twice as distant as the Abell cluster is LEDA 1617816. It has unusually sharp edges, quite blue with two arms that look more like hands on a clock than spiral arms. They don\'t even come off at opposite angles as is usually the case. I was wondering how NED would classify it. I wasn\'t expecting R(K)3 as the classification. I think this is the rarely seen Yerkes classification scheme but usually, the middle letter is lower case, not upper case. What this means is the galaxy is rotationally symmetric (doesn\'t have an obvious spiral or elliptical structure). Has mostly K class stars in the core region and is somewhat tilted to our line of site (1 face on -- 7 edge on). There seems some disagreement if rotationally symmetric should be denoted with a \"D\" or with an \"R\". Sources vary on this but all would use lower case for the class of core stars seen. So maybe this isn\'t the correct interpretation. It\'s all I could come up with.

The night I took this was quite iffy. I started with blue expecting things to not be good enough for luminance. The blue was indeed weak but suddenly the sky cleared so I changed over to luminance but that soon went downhill with the last couple luminance frames being very weak. It then seemed to clear so I tried for green which went well. I thought red had too but when I went to process the data I find the second red image was lost entirely to clouds. I set to redo blue that was so week but the clouds that killed red only slightly parted so the blue redo was also very weak. Thus I ended up with 2 good luminance frames, two weak ones, 4 weak blue, two great green (least useful of the bunch) and only one red but that one was pretty good and had no satellites. Since I didn\'t notice this until I was processing it and it was too late to redo it I am going with what I was able to get. The result is a rather noisy image that still manages to show much of what I was after.

14\" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10\' R=1x10\' G=2x10\' B=4x10\', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Alternate Designation(s): 2MASS J11404169+2020345, 2MASS J11414803+2006134, 2MASS J11420910+2018565, 2MASS J11422449+2007096, 2MASX J11404166+2020348, 2MASX J11414804+2006127, 2MASX J11420907+2018567, 2MASX J11422448+2007100, 2MASXi J1140416+202035, 2MASXi J1141479+200614, 2MASXi J1142090+201856, 2MASXi J1142245+200710, 2XMM J114224.3+200711, ABELL 1367:[GP82] 1522, ABELL 1367:[MWI88] 15, ABELL 1367:[OWG93] A, ADBS J114227+2007, AGC 210629, AGES J114209+201924, AGES J114224+200710, AKARI J1142243+200713, ASK 629158.0, ASK 630446.0, ASK 630449.0, CGCG 097-060, CGCG 097-068, CGCG 1138.2+2038, CGCG 1139.2+2023, CGCG 1139.6+2036, CGCG 1139.8+2024, CGCG 127-024, CGCG 127-032, ECO 02930, ECO 02951, ECO 02957, ECO 02964, GALEXASC J114041.71+202036.2 , GALEXASC J114147.96+200613.0 , GALEXMSC J114041.78+202034.3 , GALEXMSC J114147.92+200611.2 , HDCE 0672 NED001, HDCE 0672 NED003, HDCE 0672 NED004, HDCE 0672 NED005, IRAS 11398+2023, IRAS F11398+2023, LDCE 0836 NED008, LDCE 0836 NED010, LDCE 0836 NED011, LDCE 0836 NED012, LGG 249:[G93] 001, LGG 249:[G93] 005, MAPS-NGP O_376_4066767, MAPS-NGP O_434_0004577, MAPS-NGP O_434_0004757, MAPS-NGP O_434_0004882, MCG +03-30-046, MCG +03-30-051, MCG +04-28-019, MCG +04-28-030, NGC 3805, NGC 3816, NGC 3821, NGC3805, NGC3816, NGC3821, NSA 113043, NSA 113421, NSA 140088, NSA 160389, NVSS J114041+202038, NVSS J114224+200711, NVSS J114225+200707, PGC 036224, PGC 036292, PGC 036314, PGC 036349, PGC036349, REIZ 1489, SDSS J114041.67+202034.6, SDSS J114148.03+200613.3, SDSS J114148.03+200613.4, SDSS J114209.10+201856.4, SDSS J114224.49+200709.4, SNF 20060125-004 HOST, UGC 06642, UGC 06656, UGC 06663, USGC U416 NED63, USGC U416 NED66, USGC U416 NED67, USGC U416 NED69, UZC J114041.7+202036, UZC J114148.0+200614, UZC J114209.1+201857, UZC J114224.5+200710, WBL 353-001, WBL 353-003, WBL 353-004, WBL 353-008, [AO95] 1139+203, [DZ2015] 650-03, [DZ2015] 650-06, [DZ2015] 650-17, [GC94] 14, [IBG2003] J114148+200612, [M98j] 142 NED01, [M98j] 142 NED02, [M98j] 144 NED02, [MO2001] J114041.7+202033.7, [MO2001] J114224.6+200707.8, [PJY2015] 587742573224329271 , [PJY2015] 588023669705146422 , [TTL2012] 141797, [TTL2012] 162003, [TTL2012] 162006,