Results for search term: 2
The search term can be an object designation or alternate designation (either full or partial), such as: 2002AM31, IRAS, ARP001, ARP 001, KKH087, IRAS20351+2521.
DescriptionImages

SH2-188

The next planetary SH2-188 looks much like the Medusa Nebula though you'll see no blue in it. But the real clue that something different is going on here is that the "white" dwarf is not in the center of the arc as it is in the Medusa Nebula. The arc is very close to the star. It is the faint blue star near the rather obvious orange star well down and left of center. Near the center, there is a bright blue star but that is not related to the nebula. So how did the central star get so far off of center? The best idea to date is that this is a runaway star. At one time it was a member of a binary star system. That star, long long ago, blew itself up nearly completely. It didn't leave a neutron star or black hole. The companion star was then flung into space by its orbital velocity much as letting David's sling release its stone. Now this rather normal star was hurtling through space. When this star eventually turned into a white dwarf and lets its outer shell puff off the shell immediately ran into the interstellar gases. While both are less dense than the best vacuum we can create in our labs there was almost immediately a collision but a very lopsided one as the gasses from the opposite side of the shell were running away from the interstellar gasses so no collision could occur to any extent. The bubble was free to expand unbothered by the dust and gas between stars to the upper right but toward the lower left, the direction the star was moving at high speed, the collision immediately slowed down the shell given off by the central star preventing it from getting very far away from its source. This very violent collision makes the red arcs you see. Notice the brightest parts of the nebula are at the point of collision. The central star in this nebula is just too weak to cause the gases to glow blue so none is seen. Note the odd stuff in the lower left corner are due to bright blue and yellow stars just off the edge of the CCD and aren't real objects, just ghosts created when a bright star hits the very edge of the glass protecting the CCD. Some are available without the glass and don't have this problem but mine isn't available without a cover so this happens every now and then. If you want some deep reading on the nature of this object and how it was formed go to:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0512028v1.pdf Note that articles from arxiv.org have been submitted to a major publication but haven't been peer-reviewed. The peer-reviewed article is behind a paywall forcing me to use the preprint version.

I've put crosshairs on the true central star in the cropped image. It is also noted in the above referenced PDF article.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10+Ha2x30', R=2x10'+Ha2x10*80% G=2x10', B=2x10'+Ha2x30*20%, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Related Designations for SH2-188

SH2-188, LBN633,


SH2-188HA2X30RED2X10AVRGB2X10R6.JPG


SH2-188HA2X30RED2X10AVRGB2X10R6CROP_CS.JPG

SH2-212

Sh2-212 also has an NGC number, 1624 though this referrs to the open cluster not the nebula. The NGC catalog lists it as being 6 or 7 stars involved in nebulosity. Sharpless recorded the HII region that is the referred to as SH2-212. Actually, it is a far more interesting and studied object than you might expect. It is thought to be about 6 thousand parsecs away (about 20 thousand light years) and helps define the Perseus arm of our galaxy. This nebula recently helped decide a major issue of star formation. When a nebula forms new stars in its core it starts to be disrupted by the effects of these stars. The question was whether star formation could happen in the regions at the outskirts where this dust and gas was being blown or would the area be disrupted too much to allow stars to form before the region became too chaotic for this to happen. It turns out stars are being formed and some have just been formed in the outer parts of this nebula by the collect and collapse method. The stars we see in the center of the nebula formed some 4 million years ago. Those formed at the edge are still mostly hidden by the dust and gas that surrounds them and fed their creation.

14" LX 200 @ F/10, L=4X10'+Ha1X30' R=2X10'+1HaX30' GB=2X10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME


NGC1624SH2-212L4X10HA1X30RGB2X10X3.jpg

SH2-219

SH 2-219 also known as LBN747 is a small emission nebula in western Auriga showing you it was imaged months ago and I'm just getting it processed. While there's been a lot of study on this compact emission nebula associated with a larger unseen molecular cloud, the distance to it is rather vague. The best estimate is about 13700 light years plus or minus 2000 light years. Using the 13700 figure it would be about 12 light-years across. It is thought to be very young, maybe no more than 100,000 years since the stars causing it to glow were born. Deep infrared shows a star cluster embedded in its southwest corner. That area is bluer than the rest so may have some reflection component from this cluster though I see no sign of its stars at visual frequencies. The IR POSS2 plate shows some hint of it. Also, there is reported to be a 2000 solar mass molecular cloud nearby but no other information about it that I could find other than it is about 24 light years long. This image is taken looking at the heart of the winter Milky Way. It's gas and dust seem to be blocking all but a very few distant galaxies. I couldn't find but a very few and only saw them after blowing up the image considerably.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10 RGB=2x10, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Related Designations for SH2-219

SH2-219, LBN747,


SH2-219L4X10HA2X10RGB2X10X3.jpg

SH2-226

SH2-226 is one I apparently never did publish. It needs H alpha data to bring it out. I can't find much, if anything on it. It is also known as LBN 780. I can't find a distance other than a mention it is likely beyond the Auriga OB1 association which itself is in the outer reaches of our galaxy. Maybe it was the lack of info that caused me not to ever publish it.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10'X3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Related Designations for SH2-226

SH2-226, LBN780,


SH2-226L4X10RGB2X10X3.jpg


SH2-226L4X10RGB2X10X3CROP800.jpg

SH2-228

Sharpless 228 is also known as LBN 784. It contains a known infrared star cluster. Since I can't take images in infrared light it doesn't show in my shot. It is hidden by the dust of the nebula. What we do see in my shot is the ionized hydrogen on its surface caused to glow by super hot ultraviolet emitting stars that have escaped the confines of the nebula and are now causing the hydrogen on its surface to glow the characteristic pink color of ionized hydrogen. Sharpless 228 appears to be about 11,500 light-years away so is not a nearby object. An IR image of the cluster can be seen at:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/ps/0309/0309196v1.aa0009f2.jpg
With careful comparison you can match the stars in my image to the IR shot as the orientation, north up, is the same and the image scale is rather similar as well.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Related Designations for SH2-228

SH2-228, LBN784,


SH2-228LBN784L4X10RGB2X10X3.jpg

SH2-235

SH2-235 is considered to be caused by the collision of two vast molecular clouds. The collision has triggered a great amount of star formation that is only seen in deep dust-penetrating infrared light. I've seen it called the "Brain Nebula". It is about 1800 light-years away by some estimates. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1996ApJ...463..630H&link_type=ARTICLE&db_key=AST&high=

The faint H alpha seen in the upper left corner is a very small part of SH2-232. Even fainter tendrils from SH2-231 can be seen coming in from the right. They, along with SH2-233 way off to the right of my image are all part of the same complex per the cited paper.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=8x10' RGB=3x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Related Designations for SH2-235

SH2-235,


SH2-235L8X10rgb3X10X3R.jpg

SH2-239

Sharpless 239 is a mostly reflection/dark nebula with several Herbig-Haro objects embedded in it -- the pink spots. It also contains a mystery I've not been able to solve. Notice the three near star-like points in a triangle in its center. The POSS 1 and 2 plates show only two. The one at the lower left is missing! I've tried to find out about it but so far with no luck. My first thought was a variable star though I couldn't find any listed for its position. Checking what few images of this object exist on the net I find all modern ones show the star-like object but those dating to the time of the POSS plates don't. I contacted an astronomer in Hawaii that was supposed to be an expert and was told it was on his narrow band image (great shot with a 2.5 meter scope) but he provided no date. Since it wasn't a "new" object he wasn't interested and told me that it was worthless to compare narrow-band images to the POSS plates, totally ignoring the fact my shot wasn't narrow-band! I wrote him back asking why it wasn't allowed to compare wide-band red images to red POSS plates and got no reply. Maybe my email didn't get through his filters. My original email was relayed by another astronomer who I didn't bother to relay my reply. Thus he will remain nameless here. It appears that sometime between the POSS plates and today this object has come out of the murky depths of the nebula for us to see. Though in doing so it didn't change the nebula much that I can see. I do see a slight brightening in this area on the POSS 2 plates so it may have just started to appear about that time. Or maybe it is a variable star everyone since has caught at near maximum. I just don't know.

Rather than type away as to what an HH (Herbig-Haro) object is I'll just refer to this link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbig-Haro_object

They aren't necessarily pink (pink is due to ionized hydrogen gas) and in fact, the other two star-like objects carry HH designations and the "new" one may be another that is now showing as blocking dust moved out of our line of sight. I wanted to see it in IR light but couldn't find any images. I'd hoped to find some by Spitzer. If anyone knows of any let me know.

For a color image of this object made from the POSS plates (without my mystery object) see:
http://galaxymap.org/cgi-bin/details.py?id=21557&t=hii&s=4_p31.5xp30.5&name=S239

I found no solid distance estimate for this object but if it is associated with the same dust cloud as T Tauri - which appears quite possible then it is a bit under 600 light years from us.

After I posted this image Adriano, an imager I've exchanged posts with, made a movie using the POSS I and II images (both blue and red combined) and my image (color). It shows the star-like object coming out of the merk but to our surprise, it shows something else. The HH objects (not the star-like object) are moving! The movie covers from the mid 50's to about 2008 when my image was taken so covers about 50 years.

One explanation as to why they move is this is a light echo. Off-screen, to the northeast, a supernova apparently blue some time in the past. Its UV light is hitting the H2 in the HH objects. I'm mostly seeing the H alpha as does the red POSS plates he used. The light of the supernova is traveling through space illuminating a piece of the HH objects but not all of them. As the light hits across the HH regions like a series of flashbulbs different parts are illuminated. Several pros I contacted say this is likely. But the movement covers 50 years of time. The entire nebula isn't that big let alone these tiny HH objects. I wrote back asking how an echo would need 50 years to move such a short distance? I got some answers but I'm still lost. To me that UV source has to be constant over 50 years, not a flash bulb and the HH objects really moving. Pros don't agree. Maybe a reader can figure it out.

I was having issues with a strong red gradient and didn't have the tools back in 2008 to deal with that. Thus the nebula is likely redder than it appears in my image. I need to retake it as I found the source of the red gradient years ago and eliminated it. Since Adriano's movie uses my poor color image I haven't reprocessed it either.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=6x10' R=2x10'x3, GB=3x10'X3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Related Designations for SH2-239

SH2-239, LBN821,


SH2-239-animation.gif


SH2-239L6X10R2X10X3GB3X10X3.gif


SH2-239L6X10R2X10X3GB3X10X3_regr1.jpg

SH2-241

Sh2-241 is an emission nebula in southern Auriga just below vdB65. I found several distance estimates. All put it over 15,000 light-years distant. The only one with error bars says 17,000 light-years +/- 3500 light-years. In any case, it is at least 4 times further away than its neighbor, vdB 65.

Again I was fighting severe clouds that hampered my image. I used the best data from 2 nights to try and piece it together, some were taken the same night as vdB65 but while I had good conditions for some of the vdB65 image conditions had gone downhill by the time I moved to Sh2-242. H alpha came from the second night, most of the color and luminance from the first.

SIMBAD identifies the brightest part of the nebula around the star as the reflection nebula GN 06.00.9. That appears completely overtaken by the emission nebula. The blue data for the brightest part of the nebula is a bit bluer than normal for an emission nebula but not by a great deal. Maybe it is my poor conditions that prevent me from seeing it all that well. The faint part of the nebula is also known as LBN 825. It is also listed as LBN 824 a reflection nebula. Though again I can't see the blue color I'd expect for a reflection nebula. To the west of the fainter portion is an odd yellow-orange object. It is listed as LEDA 135933. NED shows it as a galaxy but under classification say HII. I suppose this means it is a galaxy with strong HII emission. It is listed as being 400 million light-years distant. It is the only galaxy with a redshift measurement at NED in my field. There's a star just about on top of the galaxies core. In the 1" per pixel image, it does show as two separate objects if you look closely. The bright one being a field star.

With so little to annotate I wasn't going to do an annotated image but then noticed 5 asteroids I'd overlooked so did prepare one to point these out. All Green data was taken the second night (several days later) so green is missing from the brighter asteroid trails.

After processing, I noted it partly overlapped the vdB65 image though was offset to the west somewhat. I didn't realize then when processing and posting vdB 65. I did combine both into a mosaic at 1.5" per pixel and cropped the blank regions that this created. Since conditions were a bit better for much of the vdB65 image the frames were a nightmare to match. Not being a mosaic expert this is the best I could come up with.

Data for the Sh2-241 image:
14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10', Ha=3x30', RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Related Designations for SH2-241

SH2-241,


SH2-241L4X10HA3X30RGB2X10.JPG


SH2-241L4X10HA3X30RGB2X10ID.JPG


vdB65_SH2-241L4X10HA3X30RGB2X10.JPG

SH2-242

SH2-242 resembles, to my eye, a fish swimming to the left. The body is LBN 826 while the mouth, set off by a curving dark lane appears to be LBN 827. I'm no expert on these but it's the best I can determine. Most images of this object are done in narrowband which loses the reflection nebula around the probable illuminating star. It is a B0V star. It is located about 7200 light-years away in the northeast corner of Taurus. Thanks to the Tower of babble I imaged this under the LBN designations not realizing it was also on my to-do list as SH2-242. In fact, years later when I was putting this website together did my brain finally click. Fortunately, the SH2-242 designation hadn't yet been imaged so for once I didn't waste time retaking something.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Related Designations for SH2-242

SH2-242, LBN0827, LBN0826,


LBN826-7LUM4X10ARGB1X10R1.JPG

SH2-247

Sh2-247 in Gemini was imaged back in January. It was so faint my usual 2x10' color data was unusable. Even the luminosity frames were worthless but the 3 30 minute H alpha frames held usable but faint data. I need to try for color data using more and longer subframes but that will have to wait. For now, this will have to do.

Sky Map's section on Sharpless objects has this to say about it.

According to a 1989 study, Sh 2-247 is part of the Gem OB1 association, contains 37 thousand solar masses of gas and dust at a distance of 2200 pc, and appears to be physically connected through CO filaments with Sh 2-252. It is ionised by the B0 III giant LS V +21 27.

Avedisova agrees on the ionising star but gives a larger distance estimate of 3500 +/- 800 parsecs. She places Sh 2-247 in the complex star formation region SFR 188.93+0.79 with 51 components, including 9 masers, several infrared star clusters, at least 4 molecular clouds, and the young stellar object IRAS 06058+2138.

Now you know as much as I do about it. For the parsec challenged one pc equals 3.26 light years so the first estimate puts it at about 7200 light years while the second is saying 11,400 +/- 2600 light years. Since no error bar is given for the first estimate I can't tell if they overlap or not.

14" LX200R @ f/10, Ha=3x30', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Related Designations for SH2-247

SH2-247, LBN843,


SH2-247HA3X30R.jpg